Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Preview — The Awakening by Kate Chopin. The Awakening by Kate Chopin.
When first published in , The Awakening shocked readers with its honest treatment of female marital infidelity. Audiences accustomed to the pieties of late Victorian romantic fiction were taken aback by Chopin's daring portrayal of a woman trapped in a stifling marriage, who seeks and finds passionate physical love outside the confines of her domestic situation. Aside f When first published in , The Awakening shocked readers with its honest treatment of female marital infidelity.
Aside from its unusually frank treatment of a then-controversial subject, the novel is widely admired today for its literary qualities. Edmund Wilson characterized it as a work "quite uninhibited and beautifully written, which anticipates D. Lawrence in its treatment of infidelity.
Get A Copy. Paperback , pages. Published by Elibron Classics first published More Details Original Title. Other Editions Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about The Awakening , please sign up.
Is The Awakening a Feminist text? Trey Yes and no. While the book explores themes of self-discovery, independence, and the role of women in society it is also critical of irrational action …more Yes and no. While the book explores themes of self-discovery, independence, and the role of women in society it is also critical of irrational action and abandoning family.
It depends on the reader and the lens the book itself is viewed through. It is lauded by some students and teachers and commentators as a feminist masterpiece. Others would pin it as satire or a critique of feminism. Regardless, it's an interesting story. Chopin is no Chekhov, but it's pretty entertaining and makes one think. What do you think the two lovers and the lady in black represent in the story? Susan Coffey to paraphrase sparknotes, the "lady in black" represents widowhood, Edna is longing for independence and freedom, in Victorian times becoming a widow …more to paraphrase sparknotes, the "lady in black" represents widowhood, Edna is longing for independence and freedom, in Victorian times becoming a widow was the only socially acceptable way of gaining independence via freedom from marriage.
See all 17 questions about The Awakening…. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Start your review of The Awakening. Why so many ugly one star reviews?
All about as insightful as the ubiquitous one star reviews of Lolita which call Nabokov the man a child molester, raving morons who can't distinguish a character from an author and go beyond simply missing the point.
And how ironic that all these reviews seem to be from women raging that this book which they all obviously read for their 'gender theory' class features a character who abandons her children. Ugh, women who criticize this as a feminist novel beca Why so many ugly one star reviews? Ugh, women who criticize this as a feminist novel because the main character isn't a good mom and then base their ratings solely on how much they like the main character.
Do these people only give high ratings to books with characters they like? Do they think women characters in fictional books shouldn't have flaws, ennui, and basically everything that makes a character good? They want the character to be human but lack any flaws, they want her to be a feminist hero but denounce her for not putting her children before herself.
Is it that they would have accepted it in a male character but not from a 'wife and mother' because when I read these reviews that is what it looks like to me. Why is she in all those one star reviews held up and judged as a woman and not a human being?
Is that not the essence of feminism? If so these dumb broads are the ones who are anti-woman, not Chopin, who wrote this in for fuck sake! The whole point of the book is about her discovering herself as an individual, and that even as an individual we exist in a society and as humans have to balance being an individual with the fact we are social animals. Her failure isn't that she abandoned the children but that she abandons herself.
If this has a failure as a feminist novel it is the formulaic ending where she is punished for her desires. I'd like to see a story when the woman runs away and is not punished by death, as is the always the ending, now that would be progress!
Not that it's a great book, my few friends who rated it gave in mostly 3 stars, and that's about right, I'm adding an extra star out of spite.
Also, this is my first book read on my new kindle, so that was pretty exciting! View all comments. Often I have witnessed women, who proceed to talk about misogyny, sexism, or state their views on a piece of feminist literature, starting their discourse with something along the lines of 'I'm not much of a feminist As if it is best to put a considerable distance between themselves and this feared word at the onset and deny any possible links whatsoever.
As if calling herself a feminist automatically degrades a woman to the position of a venom-spewing, uncouth, unfeminine, violent creat Often I have witnessed women, who proceed to talk about misogyny, sexism, or state their views on a piece of feminist literature, starting their discourse with something along the lines of 'I'm not much of a feminist As if calling herself a feminist automatically degrades a woman to the position of a venom-spewing, uncouth, unfeminine, violent creature from hell whose predilections include despising all males on the planet with a passion and shouting from the rooftops about women's rights at the first opportunity.
Attention ladies and gentlemen! Feminism is not so cool anymore, at least not in the way it was in the 80s or 90s. Don't ask what set off that particular rant but yes I suppose the numerous 1-star reviews of this one could have been a likely trigger. So Edna's story gets a 1 star because she is a 'selfish bitch' who falls in love with another man who is not her husband, doesn't sacrifice her life for her children and feels the stirrings of sexual attraction for someone she doesn't love in a romantic way.
Edna gets a 1 star because she dares to put herself as an individual first before her gender specific roles as wife and mother. But so many other New Adult and erotica novels IF one can be generous enough to call them 'novels' for lack of a more suitable alternative term virtually brimming with sexism, misogyny and chock full of all the obnoxious stereotypes that reinforce society's stunted, retrogressive view of the relationship dynamics between a man and woman, get 5 glorious stars from innumerable reviewers majority of whom are women on this site.
This makes me lose my faith in humanity and women in particular. Edna Pontellier acknowledges her awakening and her urge to break away from compulsions imposed on her by society. She embraces her 'deviance' and tries to come to terms with this new knowledge of her own self. She desires to go through the entire gamut of human actions and emotions, regardless of how 'morally' ambiguous, unjustified or self-centered each one of them maybe.
And isn't THAT the whole point of this feminism business? Somehow being a bad father is reasonably acceptable, but being a bad mother constitutes a sacrilegious act. Edna's husband is equally responsible for abandoning their children as she is. He limits his role as a father to performing minor tasks like buying them bonbons, peanuts and gifts and lecturing his wife on how they should be raised without bothering to shoulder some of her burden.
As if the task of raising children requires the sole expertise of the mother and the father can nonchalantly evade all responsibility while maintaining a lingering presence in their lives. I have seen readers being empathetic to unfaithful fictional husbands and their existential dilemmas case in point being Tomas and Franz in 'The Unbearable Lightness of Being' which I am currently reading and even trying to rationalize their incapability of staying in monogamous relationships.
But oh heaven forbid if it's a woman in the place of a man! Women are denied entrance into the world of infidelity or casual sex and in the rare case that they are allowed, they are given labels like 'slut', 'whore', 'tart' and so on. They need to be absolute models of perfection without fail - angelic, compassionate, thoughtful, always subservient, forever ready to be at your service as a good mother and a good wife and languish in a perpetual state of self-denial with that forced sweet smile stuck on their faces.
Double standards much? Edna is a little flawed and, hence, very humane. Edna is in all of us. And her cold refusal to let societal norms decide the course of her life, reduce her to the state of mere mother and wife only makes her brave in my eyes. And I can only salute her for her act of defiance. View all 72 comments. Shelves: classic-or-cannonical , needs-a-sassy-gay-friend-real-bad , reviewed , audio. In a hearing I observed once, the husband testified that he had tried to have his wife served with his petition for divorce in the Costco parking lot.
Tolstoy writes the cautionary morality-tale version in Anna Karenina , Flaubert writes the pastoral tragedy version in Madame Bovary , and Elizabeth Gilbert writes the self-involved douche version in Eat Pray Love , to name a few. But, then, The Awakening. This one is my favorite. This is the beautiful one.
For example, there is this: "Do you know Mademoiselle Reisz? I know her by sight. I've heard her play. It is a sad spectacle to see the weaklings bruised, exhausted, fluttering back to earth. Just the image of a bird in a cage is something out of place, confined where it should be free.
It is unwelcome and unnatural out of the cage, but unable to leave. The movie Moulin Rouge uses the image, too. A woman defying tradition and prejudice, as Mademoiselle Riesz says, is unwelcome and must have particularly strong wings to fly away.
But, all of these stories that imagine something beyond tradition have Thelma and Louise endings. It is just the only conceivable alternative in a society that offers nothing for women but marriage. Probably too much at times. That is one of the main reasons I hate weddings — because so often you have this new, fragile relationship, and what do people decide to do to it?
Smash it with the sledgehammer of planning a giant event that symbolizes the most bitter and painful emotional vulnerabilities of everyone in the general vicinity. The relationship might be beautiful and strong going into a wedding, but after getting piled with the emotional baggage of the families and friends involved, it is something else entirely. It is just off the rack, but threadbare already from wear and strain.
And a marriage, a wedding, is not a relationship. A marriage is a contract. A wedding is an event. A divorce is a dissolution of a contract. A relationship is something else.
Sometimes a wedding is too heavy for a relationship to bear, and sometimes a marriage is too heavy for it. It often looks to me, when people get engaged, like they are trying to subscribe to a certain type of relationship and the engagement is the subscription form.
And, nobody knows how strong they are but the people in the relationship, and sometimes not even them. But, also, if you are Edna, if you are living your life, going along, and then you suddenly realize that you are not living your life, but that you are in some kind of costume and acting in a play: devastation. None of your relationships exist, but the people around you have relationships with the character you played.
And there is no going back. You've already betrayed them, and you didn't even know it, and they've already betrayed you by not realizing you weren't you. When you start realizing who you are, there is too much momentum to turn around. You are already out of the cage and flying away, whether your wings are strong or weak, whether the wind is for you or against you.
The end of this story, to me, is a rejection of that world, which held nothing for Edna. It is a demand for something else. It is sad, yes, because it is appalling that there was nothing for her, but it is not wrong or unfair, I think. While I do not think the story is cautionary to women, I do think it is cautionary to the world. It says, what you hold for us, with your rigid, gendered propriety and your cages, is not enough. We are more, so the world needs to be more.
And I think it has become more. There are other options now because of books like this. It is not easy or perfect, but it is something real, something that exists. View all 47 comments. This review is being posted mainly because of the awesome backstory.
I actually had to read this twice in high school and didn't care for it much either time. But, here comes my great story! When I was a sophomore in high school I went out with this girl who eventually dumped me and gave the reason that she was only going out with me until the guy she really liked showed interest in her.
A real downer! Fast forward to senior year. I was in theater and I just so happened to do shows at the all g This review is being posted mainly because of the awesome backstory. I was in theater and I just so happened to do shows at the all girls school where the aforementioned girl went. After a performance I was Albert Peterson in Bye Bye Birdie , she came up to me and said that she needed to talk to me and that she was interested in me attending prom with her!??
I hadn't talked to her in a couple of years. I said yes, but I was skeptical. While at prom she sat me down for "the talk". She said that she felt terrible for what she did to me. She said that while reading The Awakening, she started to realize that I was really good to her and being the place holder for this other guy was not fair to me. This essay ended up winning some sort of state-wide competition. So, I got my vindication, but history repeated itself - at least I wasn't officially dating her this time!
View all 60 comments. May 01, Brother Odd rated it did not like it. I'd like to give this book ZERO stars, but it's not an option. This is hands down the worst book that I've ever read. I will never say that again in a review, because this one wins that prize. I had to read this thing twice in college, and it is a horrible story.
We are supposed to feel sympathy for a selfish woman with no redeemable qualities. Just because her marriage is bad it does not give her the right to be a lousy, despicable person.
Get a divorce? Find new love? Abandon your children, be completely self-absorbed, commit adultery, and drown yourself? No, no, no, and no. This is my problem with the book. Drowning oneself and leaving one's children without the guidance of their mother is a tragedy. The book would have you believe it is a triumph.
This is the irredeemable flaw in the book. It is also physically impossible to die the way she did. You cannot float to the bottom of the ocean. Your body will force you to swim and fight. It is a scientific fact that you cannot drown yourself without a struggle. She would have struggled in the end. Yes you can swim out so far that you can't make it back in and would drown in the process.
But no, you can't just sink to the bottom. It would be a horrible, gagging, gasping, throwing up salt water, kicking your arms and legs fight. The writing itself is nothing special. It's not bad. Chopin is not a bad writer on a technical level, but she is no expert either.
I hate to be the one raining on the parade, but this is the most overrated book I have ever come across. View all 49 comments. Aug 07, James rated it really liked it Shelves: 3-written-preth-century , 1-fiction. I read this book several years ago and wrote a paper on how society treated women during that period in literature.
I cut and paste some from it below, as I think it offers more than a normal review on this one. Please keep in mind, I'm referring to women in the 19th century, i. As for the book -- it's fantastic And for the record, I loved Edna Note: some spoilers below about the ending.
Read with caution. Society expects women to remain pure and chaste, to ignore the urge to engage in any type of behavior that could be construed as flirtatious, and to follow the demands of their fathers until marriage. However, women see these limitations as too restrictive, which is why they live their lives in a way that suits them and not others. Women often take control of their own lives by participating in flirtatious behaviors, ignoring parental wishes, and engaging in pre-marital sex.
When women are married and still wish to live their own lives, they may have extra-marital affairs, they may leave their husbands or lovers, and they may commit suicide. These behaviors are ways of striking out against the unfair limitations placed on them. As a result of this hostility and striking out, whether or not women are truly innocent has pervaded the minds of American society.
The realistic period of literature, from the end of the Civil War to World War I- , contains many works that are representative of women and their level of innocence.
Edna is somewhat guilty, although she has an excuse. Edna is just entering her womanhood for the first time at a time when views were quite different than today. She may lose her innocence with several men, but she never knew what innocence was prior to her sexual awakening.
After thinking about her future, Edna meanders down the path of self-destruction and commits suicide, as a way to get out of the misery that she is in. When her innocence appears to be lost, she chooses to take her own life, rather than fight to show society that she has done nothing wrong.
However, she never really loses her innocence permanently, as it was only hidden under her awakening to womanhood. Even though the story still takes place in America, the French Creole society is more European than American. It expects the people that live there to follow European beliefs about women, innocence, and sexuality. Edna has been married to Leonce Pontellier for several years and they have two sons also.
They spend their summer vacations on an island off the coast of Louisiana during the summers, not that far from the mainland where they usually live. Edna grew up with a father who expected her to follow his rules as perfectly as possible. His interpretation of religion was to be irreconcilable during the week, and then atone for it on Sundays at worship. Edna thus became two separate souls within her own body.
She wanted to be pious and good which explains why she remained married to Leonce in a loveless marriage for nearly ten years. However, she also had a passionate, wild side to her which suddenly erupted after she met Robert Lebrun on the Grand Isle.
According to James H. Justus, the imbalance which haunts Edna is within the self, and the dilemma is resolved in terms of her psychic compulsions. Edna Pontellier is bored with her husband, her life of motherhood and housekeeping upon her return to the mainland.
She also wants to be free to do whatever she chooses instead of being chained to her husband. She enjoys the attention that she gets from Robert and finds the young man quite attractive.
Edna never had a chance to grow up as a woman. As a result, she is forced to suppress her sexuality, and it comes out full force during her summer vacation with the Lebruns. She finally has evidence from the way Robert has been treating her and from her own emerging sense of self that she might choose to live in a more meaningful, constructive and active way.
However, Edna loses Robert when he leaves the country, and she is forced to return home with her husband and two children where her life becomes monotonous and dull without Robert. Later, She meets Alcee Arobin, who reminds her of Robert in some ways. Edna and Arobin also begin an affair with each other. He is a sexual partner who does not ask for, expect, or give love. Consequently, Edna need not feel that she is compromising him because she loves another.
What she slowly discovers is that there is no way to separate what the body does from what the mind or heart is feeling without creating a violation of self Bogarad Edna definitely seems as though she has no morals by this time. Edna Pontellier is a victim of fate, and cannot be faulted for that. She knows what she wants, and does not settle for less. Till the very end she kept me guessing — Will she relinquish her independence for the sake of her children?
Or will she go ahead and chase her dreams, living for herself alone? This book has a fairly large set of negative reviews, which is frustrating but not surprising. He limits his role as a father to performing minor tasks like buying them bonbons, peanuts and gifts. He also lectures his wife on how they should be raised without playing an active role in raising them. The years that are gone seem like dreams-if one might go on sleeping and dreaming-but to wake up and find-oh! It is about adultery without being sexual.
On the contrary, there is a beauty and innocence in the way this story unfolds. The ending made me ask myself a few questions — Does freedom have a cost, and if so how much are we willing to pay? Can a person be happy while being a part of any system? Is separating ourselves from the system all it takes to be free of oppression? Can we ever be completely free as we continue to exist in this world, succeeding in eschewing every single thing that holds us back? But in this day, my hopes are high.
This book will stay in your mind, reminding you that perhaps it is better to wake up, after all. I am eternally grateful to my Goodreads friend Emma for suggesting The Awakening to me.
This book, had an effect on me akin to that of The Colour Purple, another early feminist masterpiece. It made me stronger in my resolve to be conscious of my choices, in a patriarchal society that still rewards women for sacrifices, and demonizes them for selfishness.
Featured Image Credit: A still from the audio book. Nalini sharma is a fresher in the ever-expanding school of feminism. It's amazing how differently I saw her character as my life circumstances changed. It's still," she says, "one of my favorite novels. I felt, as a mother, that it was incredibly selfish -- because I did interpret that final scene as a suicide -- that to be committing suicide, to be abandoning her children was an incredibly selfish thing to do.
REHM So it was not so much her intense concentration on this younger man, her frustration at not being able to be with him that bothered you so much as the ending of the book. She was entitled to feel her feelings, but it was the choice of what she did with those feelings. You know, she's not the person, I guess, you'd turn around two times to look for. I mean, that's the term that's used and so I felt that when you see her being attracted to other women, you know, in terms of them, I think that's very important.
Because what you want to look at is the inner beauty, you know, and I think would tie back into her desire to be an artist and create beauty. So that's what I look at in terms of the relationship there. Edna Pontellier could not have told why wishing to go to the beach with Robert she should, in the first place, have declined, in the second place, have followed an obedience to one of the two contradictory impulses that impelled her.
A certain light was beginning to dawn dimly within her, the light which showing the way, forbids it. At that early period, it served but to bewilder her. It moved her to dreams, to thoughtfulness, to the shadowy anguish which had overcome her, the midnight when she had abandoned herself to tears. Pontellier was beginning to realize her position in the universe as a human being and to recognize her relations as an individual to the world within and about her.
This may seem like a ponderous weight of wisdom to descend upon the soul of a young woman of Perhaps more wisdom than the Holy Ghost is usually pleased to vouch safe to any woman. She had really no one to talk to. When she went to Adelle sp? That's where Adelle was. Remember the children, she said. She knew what was going on. And when she went to Madame Weiss, she was getting a carefree, you can live and be whatever you want to be. She was getting that. So she was sort of between the two.
The one person she might've gone to and didn't was the doctor who understood what was going on with her and said to her, on that walk back to the house, please come and talk to you. And she never went to him, but she -- my sadness was that there was really no one that she could talk to who could help her understand what she was going through. I felt that depression as a young mother confined to the house, confined by the strictures of society. I love my two children.
I adore them, but nevertheless that kind of depression of loneliness, of isolation of lack of choice certainly affected me. So I could understand it of her. MILLER Yeah, where you could see this in recent literature, it would probably be Ntozake Shange's play "For Colored Girls," at the end of the play with Crystal and Beau Willie where, all of a sudden, you know, Crystal has children, Beau Willy calls the children to him, you know, he gets him up and he dangles them over the window.
And, you know, he's asking, do you love me and she can't say anything and he drops the kids. But what does Ntozake say when they come back to that character? There was no air and this woman was suffocating. MILLER And what happened, she had to find herself and defining herself as a person, not defined as a mother, you know, but who she was.
And it was difficult. But I saw happening in that play -- and then what happened. You have Ntozake writing at the end, I've found god in myself and I loved her fiercely. REHM You know, the other literary piece this reminded me of was the play "The Doll's House" which I saw performed in brief not long ago at the Danish Embassy, the same kind of stifling within marriage that the young woman felt.
But in that case, standing up and breaking out and breaking away and establishing a new life for herself. In this case, as you say, Judith, she takes a very different way out, deserting her children, leaving her life behind which was total tragedy. The author decided that the book needed to close this way. And was that a necessity in order for the book to be published? Did we need -- was it necessary to have this character punished in a sense or would the book never have seen the light of day?
The writing was considered to be terrible. REHM And it wasn't until ten years after her death that somehow the book came to light and people recognized it for its literary worth. WARNER Although it wasn't really valued and recognized as a feminist work until, of course, much later, I guess, until we had the vocabulary to see it that way.
And I don't know. WARNER I was very surprised to find that women my age -- and I'm 46 now -- and I was gathering stories, impressions for this about ten years ago for "Perfect Madness" were feeling the kinds of feelings that you describe yourself having felt when you were a young mother because they didn't necessarily -- those feelings weren't a necessary part of their existence anymore. The world had presumably changed so much for us. We had supposedly many choices.
We had all sorts of different roles that we could play and the best education possible when we talk about the limitations of a woman like Edna. WARNER And yet women were feeling a lot of that same depression and isolation and anxiety, uncertainty about who they were.
Their sense of self could be derailed so easily in a sense by motherhood, at least certainly if they were home with their children. If they were working, I think that was much less the case.
We would meet at night in each other's living rooms and we would talk about whether we were bored, whether we were scared, what we were being called to do or not called to do. And that, for me, was one of the most important parts of my life is to have those of you that I could truly be honest with.
I could say all of those things, know that you respected that and that you understood. And, as I say, I took it very personally because that was so important to me coming out of a world where in many ways the expectations for me were somewhat the same as the expectations for Edna.
REHM All right. I'd like to welcome listeners into the program to offer their own comments. Let's go first to St. Petersburg, Fla. Good morning, Rob. Thanks for joining us. ROB Good morning, Diane. Thank you for having me on this show. Petersburg and I have rediscovered Kate Chopin's work recently when I adapted one of her short stories, "The Dream of an Hour" for a ten-minute play.
I love "The Awakening," but I like her short stories more because she says everything so beautifully in her short stories about those struggles for women's independence and the women's search for freedom. And while I really, really find the ending of the novel "The Awakening" very depressing because I think Edna could have broken away like Nora in "The Doll's House" and had found a niche for herself.
So I'm hoping that people will be able to go out more and read more of Kate's stuff because she really speaks to the heart and the mind. And keep in mind, too, that women were chattel at the time she wrote the story. REHM Absolutely, absolutely. Rob, you make such good points and I, too, hope that people not only listening to this program, but talking among each other, will, in fact, turn to the short stores and this particular novel. There are an awful lot of people on the phone who some of whom have very, very strong feelings about Edna.
Let's go to Marsha in Charlotte N. Good morning, you're on the air. And the tour guide had mentioned this book and said it was one of her favorites.
So I just read it a few weeks ago. And as I was reading it, what kept appearing to me was that this woman was a manic depressive. I know it said in one part that she said, I was happy for reasons that I didn't know why and sometimes I was sad for reasons I didn't know why.
And to me that sounds like such a classic case of being manic depressive. REHM And of course, at that time, there would have been no way to treat manic depressive order. Before any of you responds, let me just remind our listeners, you're listening to "The Diane Rehm Show.
But I didn't -- I mean, I thought about that. But I just think she was -- felt so closed in, she had no options. And her feelings were fluctuating all over the place as she was beginning to come into herself and to be aware of who she was as Edna. Not daughter, not sister, not mother, not friend. So I didn't -- I rejected that when I thought about it.
He called the doctor, something must be wrong with her, you know. She's not listening to me. She must be sick, you know. I mean, now whether he wants to put the pressure -- he just wants to put something on as a label to say, okay, explain her behavior. I mean, I think she was going through the kinds of ups and downs and turbulence that a lot of us go through when we're in our teens or very early 20s and everything is uncertain and there are a lot of new experiences.
And I think a woman like Edna didn't have, again, that coming-of-age period built into her life. She married young, she had her children. So in a sense, I think a fair amount of her development just got pushed down the line. I'm thinking of women who say, for example, might be American women in the Middle East in compounds, you know, where there's a different culture around them and maybe their husband goes off to work and they're isolated, you know.
I'm just wondering about, you know, how do you deal with that? And keep in mind, we're talking about isolation, we're talking about solitude and sometimes people cannot deal with that the same way.
REHM I really would welcome the milkman because it was someone who came to the house. At the time, we had diaper delivery. I would be pleased to see the diaper man, the mailman, the milkman. Isolation is really key here. Edna had a certain amount of social life which, you know, my husband was working all the time. I had no car. I mean, this happens to a lot of people.
It happened in It happened in and onward. REHM And welcome back. We had a great laugh during the break here because I was talking about being happy to see the mailman, the milk man, the diaper man. And, Jane Dixon, what did you say? He talked to me. And indeed, we sat at the kitchen table and had a sandwich. And that night when I was telling my husband about that, that's when he had his awakening, said, I think you better start thinking about your life or something to that.
But the huge shock for him and for me, but this man was very nice.
0コメント